WorryFree Computers   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 45))

Abstract

‘Visual crowding’ or ‘lateral masking’ is the deleterious effect nearby contours have on the recognition and identification of symbols or letters. Its magnitude has often been estimated by comparing single optotype acuity with acuity for multiple arrays. In adults, the effect was described for peripheral vision some time ago (Ehlers, 1936; Woodworth and Schlosberg, 1954; Bouma, 1970) with a smaller similar effect being described for the fovea (Flom et al., 1963). In a number of studies of amblyopes a large crowding effect has been described (Stuart and Burian, 1962; Oliver and Nawratzki, 1971; Hilton and Stanley, 1972; Tommilla, 1972; Weiss, 1973; Youngson, 1979; Beyerstein and Freeman, 1977). To assess the degree of abnormality in amblyopes it is necessary to know the size of the crowding effect in children with normal vision. Here we report two studies using novel tasks to assess crowding in children with normal vision. The results of this study are to serve as a baseline against which to measure abnormality. Relatively naive adults have also performed the tasks for comparison purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson J, French J, Braddick O. Contrast sensitivity funetiaft of preschool children. Brit J Ophthal 1981; 65: 525–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson J, Braddick O, Pimm-Smith E. ‘Preferential looking’ for monocular and binocular acuity testing of infants. Brit J Ophthal 1982; 66: 264–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beyerstein BL, Freeman R. Lateral spatial interaction in humans with abnormal visual experience. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma M. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 1970; 226: 177–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braddick OJ, Atkinson J, French J, Howland HC. A photorefractive study of infant accommodation. Vision Res 1979; 19: 1319–1330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brant J, Nowotny M. Testing of visual acuity in young children: An evaluation of some commonly used methods. Develop Med Child Neurol 1976; 18: 568.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers H. The movement of the eyes during reading. Ophthalmologica 1936; 14: 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flom MC, Heath G, Sakahaski E. Contour interaction and visual resolution: contralateral effect. Science 1963; 142: 979–980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin A, Nyman KG, Derouet B. A modified letter matching chart for testing young children’s visual acuity. Journal of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 1980; 17: 114–118.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton AF, Stanley JC. Pitfalls in testing children’s vision by the Sheridan Gardiner single optotype method. Brit J Ophthalmol 1972; 56: 135–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kowler E, Martins AJ. Eye movements of preschool children. Science 1982; 215: 997–999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlow W, Joachimson. A screening test for visual acuity in four year old children. Scand J Psychol 1962;17:122-

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M, Nawratzki I. Screening of pre-school children for ocular anomalies. Brit J Ophthal 1971; 55: 462–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oppel O. On the development of visual acuity in children of the preschool age. Klin Mbl Augenheilk 1964; 145: 358.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slataper FJ. Age norms of refraction and vision. Arch Ophthalmol 1950; 43: 568–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smørvik D, Bosnes, 0. Assessment of visual acuity in preschool children. Scand J Psychol 1976; 17: 122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart JA, Burian HM. A study of separation difficulty: its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. Amer J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tommilla V. A new chart for testing line acuity in amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmologica 1972; 50: 565–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JB. Mesure de l’acuité visuelle du jeune enfant. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1139–1149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H. Experimental Psychology. New York: Holt. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngson RM. Anomaly in visual acuity testing in children. Brit J Ophthalmol 1979; 59: 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atkinson, J., Pimm-Smith, E., Evans, C., Harding, G., Braddick, O. (1986). Visual Crowding in Young Children. In: Jay, B. (eds) Detection and Measurement of Visual Impairment in Pre-Verbal Children. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4263-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4263-9_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8393-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4263-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics